On the Topic of Human Solidarity
Amid various discussions on the topic of free trade, human rights, and the role of governance, the Jernean government feels obligated to take a stance on the topic. The discussion hereinafter will consist of Nordstjerne’s views on the topics at hand.
1: The Role of Government
As previously stated in official memos from our government, Nordstjerne stands behind the Jacarian Realm’s collective views on governance. When the grand question is asked, it is the Realm’s motto that holds the answer.
What is the role of government?
For the Good of All.
This is reflected in Nordstjerne through many unique processes that bring the power to the people and prevent a smaller group from gaining significant control over certain areas of life.
For instance, the Jernean Treasury, through the Federal Revenue Collection Agency (FRCA), allocates the general budget through public consensus. When filling out national tax forms, citizens are encouraged to allocate their paid taxes to several sectors of spending, including education, defense, and transportation. The specifics of these budgets are then decided by Parliament, such as which schools need more teachers, where to invest in hospitals, etc. This process not only increases public trust in the government, but also prevents overspending in sectors not supported by the general public.
Beyond this, all laws passed by Parliament must be approved by a public majority ruling via referendum. This prevents abuse of power within Parliament, increases civic engagement, promotes integrity and trustworthy governance, and prevents unpopular laws from being passed nationally.
While these are just a few of the ways Nordstjerne involves the public in national ordeals, there are quite a few currently employed by the Northern Domain.
But this brings us back to our point. The purpose of government is for the good of the people, with the consent of the people, and at the mercy of the people. A government that fails in one of these sections has deemed itself as one detrimental to society’s advancement, and furthermore has failed to protect the interests of its citizenry.
2: The Role of Economics
While we agree with Novara’s principle that any extreme can prove detrimental to society, we also agree with Promothea that it is not the role of the government to use excessive force against those in business.
The purpose of the economy, first and foremost, is to promote independence, personal freedom and security, and advance society. An economy with little to no regulations, while free to do whatever it wants, can promote the unfair treatment of workers, exploitation of the environment and other areas of life, and subpar living standards. Is it in the best interests of a multi-billionaire, for instance, to provide adequate wages to their workers if their competitors don’t? Who is it that lobbies for looser environmental regulations, lower wages, and tax loopholes?
It is not the purpose of the government to punish the successful. However, it is the purpose of the government to enforce proper standards when the successful take advantage of others. It is also the role of government, and the greater economics of the state, to act as a steward for Mother Nature, and to protect her from dangers that would risk instability.
When poachers take out any species, that disrupts the entire food chain, up to and including humanity. For instance, if whaling becomes out of control, suddenly, the ocean’s nutrient cycle is critically disrupted. This endangers many different species that live within the ocean’s depths, many of which are consumed by humans. Some communities rely entirely on maritime goods for their livelihoods. Hence the need for regulations in certain portions of industry.
A free market is, without a doubt, a democratic staple. Without competition, humanity could never advance beyond where we are now. However, an unregulated industry can prove detrimental to society. Therefore, if one could combine a free market with regulations and intervention into a mixed economy, one could achieve the best of both worlds at a relatively low cost.
But at the end of the day, the regulation of the state’s economy should be supported by the people they affect. A new bill regarding the regulation of fisheries shouldn’t be supported by one group; instead, compromises have to be made so that regulations and policy fit the needs of the people.
3: The Public, the Citizenry, and the State
We agree with Promothea that public interest can be vague. However, Novara’s use of the phrase is justified and represents a global trend toward open democracy supported by the consent of the governed. The public interest should not, and cannot be decided by the government. This is the purpose of public referendums, allocated taxes, motions of no confidence, and every other protective measure used in Nordstjerne. By involving elements of direct democracy in everyday governance, the public themselves can decide where their interests lie.
In a world where technology connects us in ways previously unthinkable, our governments need to shift and follow suit. Direct democracy, or at the very least its ideals, has become feasible on a much larger scale. While it is certainly possible to have a nation entirely run by the people without the elected officials that make up this government, we are not yet to the point where such a thing is practical. For now, the democracies of the world should push for public involvement and should strive to embody the ideals of the great founders of our systems.
United we stand, divided we fall.
—
From Survival, Solace
@Novara @Promothea @Ephitemeus